The Architecture Class presents:
'The Production of Appearance' - Public Lecture Series Summer Semester 2010
Lecture
Ingo Niermann: How To Be Relevant?
Donnerstag, 27. Mai, 19 Uhr, Aula
Alle Veranstaltungen der Architekturklasse finden in englischer Sprache statt.
Ingo Niermann is a novelist, freelance writer, and editor of the book series Solution. His published books include Solution 186–195: Dubai Democracy (2010), Solution 1–10: Umbauland (2009), Solution 9: The Great Pyramid (with Jens Thiel, 2008), The Curious World of Drugs and Their Friends (with Adriano Sack, 2008), China ruft dich (2008), Metan (with Christian Kracht, 2007), Skarbek (with Antje Majewski, 2005), Atomkrieg (with Antje Majewski, 2004), Minusvisionen (2003), and Der Effekt (2001). Niermann co-founded the collective Redesigndeutschland, invented a tomb for all people The Great Pyramid and conceived the exhibition Dubai Düsseldorf at Kunstverein für die Rheinlande und Westfalen in Düsseldorf (2009).
Mittwoch, 26. Mai 2010
Dienstag, 25. Mai 2010
Hal Foster
Johann Friedrich Städel Lecture 2010
Eine Veranstaltung des Instituts für Kunstkritik
Hal Foster:
"how to survive civilization, or what i have learned from dada"
Dienstag, 25 Mai, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Hal Foster is Townsend Martin 1917 Professor of Art & Archaeology at Princeton university, coeditor of 'october' magazine, and frequent contributor to 'london review of books', 'artforum', and other journals. His "figment: painting and subjectivity in the first pop age" will appear next year from Princeton university press.
Eine Veranstaltung des Instituts für Kunstkritik
Hal Foster:
"how to survive civilization, or what i have learned from dada"
Dienstag, 25 Mai, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Hal Foster is Townsend Martin 1917 Professor of Art & Archaeology at Princeton university, coeditor of 'october' magazine, and frequent contributor to 'london review of books', 'artforum', and other journals. His "figment: painting and subjectivity in the first pop age" will appear next year from Princeton university press.
Montag, 17. Mai 2010
Antek Walczak
Vortrag
Antek Walczak: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb
Mittwoch, 19. Mai, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Walczak will be speaking about the film - Until the Light Takes Us (2009) - its subject is one that many might be familiar with - Norwegian Black Metal. Perhaps in this confluence of knowing something and knowing nothing, the few clips that will be screened during the talk will suffice to get things rolling. For the sake of discussion, this is one few films I can think of that I’d call “of this time,” both in the way it was made, and in its permeability to many other things apart from the oral history of a particular subculture. The fact of having the painter Bjarne Melgaard in the film lands us in the arena of contemporary art, which is a fine pretext to blow everything open to the subject of post-internet media and communication, and the striking differences of the past 15 years in the value and circulation of information. By a series of connections I will also bring the subject of fashion along for the ride, and as well attempt a brief revival of Marshall Mcluhan’s notion of “media, hot and cold.”
Antek Walczak was born in Grand Forks, North Dakota in 1968 and raised in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He received a BFA at New York University’s Tisch School of the Arts. His work has been shown at Cinematexas in Austin, the Pompidou Center, Fri-Art in Fribourg, Switzerland and the Museum Ludwig in Cologne. He is a core member of Bernadette Corporation since 1994. He has written for magazines/zines like Purple, Pacemaker, Pazmaker, Parkett, May Magazine, Afterall, Zehar, and Made in USA.
Antek Walczak: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb
Mittwoch, 19. Mai, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Walczak will be speaking about the film - Until the Light Takes Us (2009) - its subject is one that many might be familiar with - Norwegian Black Metal. Perhaps in this confluence of knowing something and knowing nothing, the few clips that will be screened during the talk will suffice to get things rolling. For the sake of discussion, this is one few films I can think of that I’d call “of this time,” both in the way it was made, and in its permeability to many other things apart from the oral history of a particular subculture. The fact of having the painter Bjarne Melgaard in the film lands us in the arena of contemporary art, which is a fine pretext to blow everything open to the subject of post-internet media and communication, and the striking differences of the past 15 years in the value and circulation of information. By a series of connections I will also bring the subject of fashion along for the ride, and as well attempt a brief revival of Marshall Mcluhan’s notion of “media, hot and cold.”
Antek Walczak was born in Grand Forks, North Dakota in 1968 and raised in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He received a BFA at New York University’s Tisch School of the Arts. His work has been shown at Cinematexas in Austin, the Pompidou Center, Fri-Art in Fribourg, Switzerland and the Museum Ludwig in Cologne. He is a core member of Bernadette Corporation since 1994. He has written for magazines/zines like Purple, Pacemaker, Pazmaker, Parkett, May Magazine, Afterall, Zehar, and Made in USA.
Clémentine Deliss
Vortrag
Clémentine Deliss: Anti-psychiatry / Teaching Deviance: somewhere between art practice and radical ethnography within a museum
Dienstag, 18. Mai, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Clémentine Deliss: curator, independent publisher, and since April 2010 Director of Museum of World Cultures Frankfurt, (Museum der Weltkulturen, Frankfurt). Studied contemporary art and social anthropology in Vienna, London and Paris; PhD from the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. Since 1996 producer of the writers’ and artists’ organ "Metronome", launched at the Dakar and Venice biennales; Kunsthalle Basel; DAAD, Berlin; documenta X and documenta 12; Galerie Chantal Crousel, Paris; Kandada/CommandN gallery, Tokyo. From 1999-2000, Guest Professor, Städelschule, Frankfurt. Between 2003-2010 director of Future Academy, Edinburgh College of Art with student research cells in Senegal, India, Europe, Australia, USA, and Japan. In 2007, initiated Randolph Cliff artists’ residency programme together with Edinburgh College of Art, National Galleries of Scotland, University of Edinburgh, and patron Charles Asprey. Recent artists: Thomas Struth, Frances Stark, Dexter Sinister, Ei Arakawa, Manfred Pernice, Joseph Kosuth, Dan Peterman, Marc Camille Chaimowicz. www.metronomepress.com; www.futureacademy.info
Clémentine Deliss: Anti-psychiatry / Teaching Deviance: somewhere between art practice and radical ethnography within a museum
Dienstag, 18. Mai, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Clémentine Deliss: curator, independent publisher, and since April 2010 Director of Museum of World Cultures Frankfurt, (Museum der Weltkulturen, Frankfurt). Studied contemporary art and social anthropology in Vienna, London and Paris; PhD from the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. Since 1996 producer of the writers’ and artists’ organ "Metronome", launched at the Dakar and Venice biennales; Kunsthalle Basel; DAAD, Berlin; documenta X and documenta 12; Galerie Chantal Crousel, Paris; Kandada/CommandN gallery, Tokyo. From 1999-2000, Guest Professor, Städelschule, Frankfurt. Between 2003-2010 director of Future Academy, Edinburgh College of Art with student research cells in Senegal, India, Europe, Australia, USA, and Japan. In 2007, initiated Randolph Cliff artists’ residency programme together with Edinburgh College of Art, National Galleries of Scotland, University of Edinburgh, and patron Charles Asprey. Recent artists: Thomas Struth, Frances Stark, Dexter Sinister, Ei Arakawa, Manfred Pernice, Joseph Kosuth, Dan Peterman, Marc Camille Chaimowicz. www.metronomepress.com; www.futureacademy.info
Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2010
BONNIE CAMPLIN
Vortrag
Bonnie Camplin: Free Talk
Montag, 5. Juli 2010, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Bonnie Camplin will talk about Working a Look, Bonobo Monkeys, Anarchism, discos not discourse, survivalist temporality, synthesis, Emergence, the sensory intellect and her practice within.
Camplin graduated from St Martins in 1992 and spent the next ten years in London Nightclub-land as a host, dancer and DJ. She set up many experimental avant garde/ electronic club nights around So-ho such as “The Sound” and “HARDERFASTERLOUDER”. She continued the while with her photography and collage and by 2002 had fully resumed her practice when she joined the group DonAteller with Mark Leckey, Ed Laliq and Enrico David. She has shown in London and internationally and in 2006 released a Solo LP of her experimental music Heavy Epic. She has made films, drawings, scultpture and watercolours.In 2007 she collaborated with Paulina Olowska for a two woman show “Salty Water/ What of Salty Water” at Portikus Frankfurt. Recent shows include “When the Wind Blows Up You” a performance event at Chisenhale Gallery London and “SAS” at Michael Benevento Gallery L.A. In July 2010 she will have a solo show at MIMA UK.
more Info:
http://www.cabinet.uk.com/index.php?bonnie-camplin
http://www.galeriefriedlaender.de/artists/bonnie-camplin/bonnie-camplin-images
http://www.beneventolosangeles.com/
Interview with Bonnie Camplin
Edited version published in Untitled Magazine March 2007:
Catherine Wood:
Before you made drawings and films, you were more involved in music and clubs, and you were a part of Mark Leckey’s group donAteller. How were those activities significant for you in terms of what you’re making now?
Bonnie Camplin:
I got into doing parties and club nights originally out of entrepreneurial drive, opportunity and obviously creativity. The art of a good party is in the word;. it's making participants out of anticipants. You enable this with music and surroundings and the details and the host who is the catalyst. The instinct to belong and to enjoy meaningful shared experience is what the nightclub is all about. It has this in common with religious worship and other kinds of clubs and organizations. I just wanted things to happen all the time and for it to go all haywire. I was very into dressing and looks and dancing it all into a mess. When I first met Mark Leckey he asked me to be in DonAtteller mainly because of my look at the time and he had been to one of my clubs (HARDERFASTERLOUDER) and loved it. It was agreed that we had a shared sensibility. I loved working with Mark, Ed and Enrico making the music but I think a love of dressing up and dancing does not make you a stage performer and I often felt shy on stage which I never did in a disco. People who are able to get lost in a "performance state" are very rare. Really I'm a quiet private person and being in the realm of artefact is much better for my nerves. However I am only surviving, extemporizing, responding to the phenomena and synthesizing as always.
CW: So the quieter practice of drawing or making films suits you better? You wrote in a recent text of the labour intensive process of making your drawings in HB pencil: "the sublime beauty is the evidence that I still own my time and labour. For a feminist and Marxist (self employed) who consciously participates in a free-market economy these things are important." What kind of relationship is embodied in the drawings between the making process, the image you choose and the labour-time relations you negotiate as a working artist?
BC:
When I started making those drawings it was not to illustrate a theory it was
because I wanted to see if I could commit to something that might take a
long time. The concept of longevity was foreign to me. The last time I
had done a proper drawing, as in a proper sustained "study" of something
was at school. For years the only things I had made was photographs and
photo-montages. I have always collected books that have a lot of really great images in them. So I had a lot of fabulous images and lots of time and no money. Choosing an image it is just whether it reminds me of melancholy then taking the colour out of melancholy leaves you with that other thing called ennui which is worse. in terms of style I am just reproducing the image to the best of my technical ability which is roughly equal to that of an A level Art student.
To answer your art market question: When I said I was a self employed Marxist participating in a free-market economy I was pointing up that if I internalised those conflicts then I would go mad. That's what an artist does; they externalise those conflicts. The onus is on the artist to transcend the forces that kill freedom and life. If they succeed then they provide
some meaning and therefore salvation; a great work of art is something
charged with uncanny properties which makes it priceless. The
monetary value it acquires is due to the artist having to make a living
and all the other factors are because so does everyone else involved.
CW:
I also wanted to ask you about the idea of the artist as ‘aristocrat’, thinking about Thorstein Veblen’s ‘theory of the leisure class’ in which he describes the way that the moneyed ‘leisure class’ demonstrate their wealth by engaging in time-consuming but non-productive labour, such as learning obsolete languages or knowing about fancy dog-breeding. Does this have any resonance with your perception of the artist’s position, going against the grain of being ‘efficient’ with time? I was thinking about the labour intensity of your drawings being at odds with a productive, capitalist attitude.
BC:
Economics is all about distortion. Once you recognize its elasticity you are free to set your own value on your time and labour (at least in a culture such as ours).
Re the artist as aristocrat: The way I describe it is to live “The Invented Life". The other alternative for an imaginative, sensitive person of scant means is just too hideous to mention.
CW:
Why were you interested in longevity, and why was it foreign to you?
How does the idea of longevity and labour-intensive drawing relate to the way you deal with time in your films? I am thinking particularly about your Frieze film commission from 2006, the ‘Special Afflictions by Roy Harryhozen’.
BC:
Longevity hit me as a concept when I reached the age of thirty which I
never thought I would. (It isn't such an arbitrary number. In the film
"Logan's Run" the age of thirty is when you are terminated as it is
roughly the age at which humans begin to deteriorate) Growing up with
M.A.D. i.e. Mutually Assured Destruction (My Dad was obsessed with it).
Constantly uprooting and moving home throughout childhood, Parents dying
young etc. Everything I did was informed by a strong feeling of "Well I
might die tomorrow!" and "The world could end tomorrow!". I really felt
it and believed it. This can easily manifest itself as a death-wish and
self destructive behaviour. Also because I associated ideas of
commitment and long term investment with conservative values. I couldn't
continue in that manner though because as well as being a liberating force
it was quite exhausting and debilitating for me. So it was quite a
relief and a revelation coming to terms with the concept of longevity.
The idea of longevity and labour-intensive drawing relates directly to
how I dealt with time in "Special Afflictions by Roy Harryhozen": The
"Special Afflictions" in question are each of a temporal nature. Each
character's identity is defined by the nature of their particular
"Special Affliction" or as in the language of cinema their "Special
Effect". John Prolong is slow in his delivery; he is
"time-stretched", Scratch the Hat is like an eighties "Scratch-film";
he scrubs backwards and forwards through his speech and gets stuck like
a scratched CD, Lady Silba has a kind of catatonic affliction causing
her to sporadically get "stuck in a moment". She also appears to be
rather crudely "animated" a la "Claymation". Fox is essentially a
"still" but his anima is contained in a bell jar in the form of
compressed wild dogs. In this film special effects are just a metaphor
for psychic damage caused by life events but specifically the
consequences of creative acts (or visions acted out) by humans on other
humans. Religious people believe that life was "designed" by a God
whereas Atheists believe that God is a human invention. Roy Harryhozen
represents God and he represents the other creator, the artist; both are
fallible and a potential disaster because both are only human. If you
have an imagination it is vital that you have the vigilance not to
become a casualty of it.
CW: Is your desire to expose the manipulative potential of your medium to do with the fact that you have said you no longer watch tv or listen to radio, do not have tolerance for ‘mainstream media’ any more? Do you have tolerance for, or believe in, subculture as an alternative?
Subculture is a group response to the oppressive forces within the pervading culture. It's transient by nature. I imagine it's always existed and always will. In rich Western cultures it is impossible for a person over the age of 30 to participate in its more energetic versions or truly understand it or even be aware of it. Middle aged people who participated in the relevant subculture of their own generation who complain that there's no valid one today can't bear the idea that their days of raw vitality are over yet they can't even imagine what form it would take and they can't see the contradiction in this fact. This is due to changes in their metabolism. All that's left for them to do is to stop watching TV and still they don't. Probably, the hardest part in an age of insidious marketing/ industrialized desire etc is to identify the thing in your culture that's not working for you or your group. It's like cancer. Cancer is not foreign matter it is just a proliferation of the tissue that you're made of. Mind you, Permaculture has wicker doors open to us all. So do most alternative cultures if you share their values. But don't be surprised when you realize the reactionary aspect to them all. But The real freaks are the ones who exist solely on a diet of mainstream culture ; the sick wretched fish-heads.
CW: Is there a link between this conception of ‘cancer’ and the film Cancer that you made? I was thinking of this in terms of a kind of entropic relationship between representation and what is represented: the destructing pixels and the way that you transpose an image into a highly worked pencil surface that obsessively covers every inch of the paper, kind of petrifying it?
When I made the "Cancer" video I was not thinking of mainstream culture actually I was thinking of the fact of Cancer and how it relates to proliferation of life and to creativity. I was symbolically disrupting/ corrupting/ invading the very fabric of the fact, partly demonstrating my basic doubts about the value of facts.
I have a liking for disrupting the picture plane (in some of the videos) and fixating on the surface of the image (in the HB pencil drawings) as the source of horror and claustrophobia within the act of perception. There is this thing that some people get which is like a macro very close proximity kind of hallucination which elicits a primal gag reflex kind of thing. I used to get it when I stared at the wall as I drifted off to sleep and would start to get this memory or something almost of being microscopic and the texture of the wall is suddenly magnified/ amplified loads of rubbery fingers pushing in your face only you don't have a face, as such. It isn't even a visual thing just this sightless wordless yet physical primal awareness of proximity to something else. It's a pre-lingual kind of thing that's impossible to describe accurately in words.
You describe yourself as a feminist. How do you see feminism at this point in time, and how is that a part of the historical Feminist movement? Are your collaborations with other female artists such as Lucy Mckenzie and Paulina Olowska, or indeed your involvement in the collective activity of donAteller, a part of these politics?
I am a feminist. If women have a deep sense of themselves within the world then it's good for the world because women have egos and women are mothers; if they're oppressed then the world pays the price because the only domain of influence then left for the woman is the one over her own child. Hysterical mothers make hysterical misogynist men out of sons. Also oppressed hysterical mothers take it out on their daughters especially when the daughter reaches adolescence. Woman's pleasure and sense of self is not at the expense of man's. Men would be so much happier in a truly matriarchal society. A man's physical strength belongs to women and children; it's a mistake to think that it's to enable him to subdue and control woman. Something which is overlooked in our culture is the destructive force of misandry i.e. a woman's hatred of men. The reason it's overlooked is that it's so institutionalized and so ingrained. It's actually assumed and accepted that women hate men but that's because the oppression of women is assumed and accepted. Also a woman's hatred of men when openly expressed is wrongly deemed as ineffectual. I dislike it when women refuse to acknowledge feminism. I couldn't be friends with a woman who wasn't a feminist. My collaborations with Paulina are based on shared feminist values and sisterhood but importantly we are both very interested in femininity and what is the feminine; currently inherent to my interest in autism in women- relative to the EMBTA (Extreme Male Brain theory of Autism).
Bonnie Camplin: Free Talk
Montag, 5. Juli 2010, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Bonnie Camplin will talk about Working a Look, Bonobo Monkeys, Anarchism, discos not discourse, survivalist temporality, synthesis, Emergence, the sensory intellect and her practice within.
Camplin graduated from St Martins in 1992 and spent the next ten years in London Nightclub-land as a host, dancer and DJ. She set up many experimental avant garde/ electronic club nights around So-ho such as “The Sound” and “HARDERFASTERLOUDER”. She continued the while with her photography and collage and by 2002 had fully resumed her practice when she joined the group DonAteller with Mark Leckey, Ed Laliq and Enrico David. She has shown in London and internationally and in 2006 released a Solo LP of her experimental music Heavy Epic. She has made films, drawings, scultpture and watercolours.In 2007 she collaborated with Paulina Olowska for a two woman show “Salty Water/ What of Salty Water” at Portikus Frankfurt. Recent shows include “When the Wind Blows Up You” a performance event at Chisenhale Gallery London and “SAS” at Michael Benevento Gallery L.A. In July 2010 she will have a solo show at MIMA UK.
more Info:
http://www.cabinet.uk.com/index.php?bonnie-camplin
http://www.galeriefriedlaender.de/artists/bonnie-camplin/bonnie-camplin-images
http://www.beneventolosangeles.com/
Interview with Bonnie Camplin
Edited version published in Untitled Magazine March 2007:
Catherine Wood:
Before you made drawings and films, you were more involved in music and clubs, and you were a part of Mark Leckey’s group donAteller. How were those activities significant for you in terms of what you’re making now?
Bonnie Camplin:
I got into doing parties and club nights originally out of entrepreneurial drive, opportunity and obviously creativity. The art of a good party is in the word;. it's making participants out of anticipants. You enable this with music and surroundings and the details and the host who is the catalyst. The instinct to belong and to enjoy meaningful shared experience is what the nightclub is all about. It has this in common with religious worship and other kinds of clubs and organizations. I just wanted things to happen all the time and for it to go all haywire. I was very into dressing and looks and dancing it all into a mess. When I first met Mark Leckey he asked me to be in DonAtteller mainly because of my look at the time and he had been to one of my clubs (HARDERFASTERLOUDER) and loved it. It was agreed that we had a shared sensibility. I loved working with Mark, Ed and Enrico making the music but I think a love of dressing up and dancing does not make you a stage performer and I often felt shy on stage which I never did in a disco. People who are able to get lost in a "performance state" are very rare. Really I'm a quiet private person and being in the realm of artefact is much better for my nerves. However I am only surviving, extemporizing, responding to the phenomena and synthesizing as always.
CW: So the quieter practice of drawing or making films suits you better? You wrote in a recent text of the labour intensive process of making your drawings in HB pencil: "the sublime beauty is the evidence that I still own my time and labour. For a feminist and Marxist (self employed) who consciously participates in a free-market economy these things are important." What kind of relationship is embodied in the drawings between the making process, the image you choose and the labour-time relations you negotiate as a working artist?
BC:
When I started making those drawings it was not to illustrate a theory it was
because I wanted to see if I could commit to something that might take a
long time. The concept of longevity was foreign to me. The last time I
had done a proper drawing, as in a proper sustained "study" of something
was at school. For years the only things I had made was photographs and
photo-montages. I have always collected books that have a lot of really great images in them. So I had a lot of fabulous images and lots of time and no money. Choosing an image it is just whether it reminds me of melancholy then taking the colour out of melancholy leaves you with that other thing called ennui which is worse. in terms of style I am just reproducing the image to the best of my technical ability which is roughly equal to that of an A level Art student.
To answer your art market question: When I said I was a self employed Marxist participating in a free-market economy I was pointing up that if I internalised those conflicts then I would go mad. That's what an artist does; they externalise those conflicts. The onus is on the artist to transcend the forces that kill freedom and life. If they succeed then they provide
some meaning and therefore salvation; a great work of art is something
charged with uncanny properties which makes it priceless. The
monetary value it acquires is due to the artist having to make a living
and all the other factors are because so does everyone else involved.
CW:
I also wanted to ask you about the idea of the artist as ‘aristocrat’, thinking about Thorstein Veblen’s ‘theory of the leisure class’ in which he describes the way that the moneyed ‘leisure class’ demonstrate their wealth by engaging in time-consuming but non-productive labour, such as learning obsolete languages or knowing about fancy dog-breeding. Does this have any resonance with your perception of the artist’s position, going against the grain of being ‘efficient’ with time? I was thinking about the labour intensity of your drawings being at odds with a productive, capitalist attitude.
BC:
Economics is all about distortion. Once you recognize its elasticity you are free to set your own value on your time and labour (at least in a culture such as ours).
Re the artist as aristocrat: The way I describe it is to live “The Invented Life". The other alternative for an imaginative, sensitive person of scant means is just too hideous to mention.
CW:
Why were you interested in longevity, and why was it foreign to you?
How does the idea of longevity and labour-intensive drawing relate to the way you deal with time in your films? I am thinking particularly about your Frieze film commission from 2006, the ‘Special Afflictions by Roy Harryhozen’.
BC:
Longevity hit me as a concept when I reached the age of thirty which I
never thought I would. (It isn't such an arbitrary number. In the film
"Logan's Run" the age of thirty is when you are terminated as it is
roughly the age at which humans begin to deteriorate) Growing up with
M.A.D. i.e. Mutually Assured Destruction (My Dad was obsessed with it).
Constantly uprooting and moving home throughout childhood, Parents dying
young etc. Everything I did was informed by a strong feeling of "Well I
might die tomorrow!" and "The world could end tomorrow!". I really felt
it and believed it. This can easily manifest itself as a death-wish and
self destructive behaviour. Also because I associated ideas of
commitment and long term investment with conservative values. I couldn't
continue in that manner though because as well as being a liberating force
it was quite exhausting and debilitating for me. So it was quite a
relief and a revelation coming to terms with the concept of longevity.
The idea of longevity and labour-intensive drawing relates directly to
how I dealt with time in "Special Afflictions by Roy Harryhozen": The
"Special Afflictions" in question are each of a temporal nature. Each
character's identity is defined by the nature of their particular
"Special Affliction" or as in the language of cinema their "Special
Effect". John Prolong is slow in his delivery; he is
"time-stretched", Scratch the Hat is like an eighties "Scratch-film";
he scrubs backwards and forwards through his speech and gets stuck like
a scratched CD, Lady Silba has a kind of catatonic affliction causing
her to sporadically get "stuck in a moment". She also appears to be
rather crudely "animated" a la "Claymation". Fox is essentially a
"still" but his anima is contained in a bell jar in the form of
compressed wild dogs. In this film special effects are just a metaphor
for psychic damage caused by life events but specifically the
consequences of creative acts (or visions acted out) by humans on other
humans. Religious people believe that life was "designed" by a God
whereas Atheists believe that God is a human invention. Roy Harryhozen
represents God and he represents the other creator, the artist; both are
fallible and a potential disaster because both are only human. If you
have an imagination it is vital that you have the vigilance not to
become a casualty of it.
CW: Is your desire to expose the manipulative potential of your medium to do with the fact that you have said you no longer watch tv or listen to radio, do not have tolerance for ‘mainstream media’ any more? Do you have tolerance for, or believe in, subculture as an alternative?
Subculture is a group response to the oppressive forces within the pervading culture. It's transient by nature. I imagine it's always existed and always will. In rich Western cultures it is impossible for a person over the age of 30 to participate in its more energetic versions or truly understand it or even be aware of it. Middle aged people who participated in the relevant subculture of their own generation who complain that there's no valid one today can't bear the idea that their days of raw vitality are over yet they can't even imagine what form it would take and they can't see the contradiction in this fact. This is due to changes in their metabolism. All that's left for them to do is to stop watching TV and still they don't. Probably, the hardest part in an age of insidious marketing/ industrialized desire etc is to identify the thing in your culture that's not working for you or your group. It's like cancer. Cancer is not foreign matter it is just a proliferation of the tissue that you're made of. Mind you, Permaculture has wicker doors open to us all. So do most alternative cultures if you share their values. But don't be surprised when you realize the reactionary aspect to them all. But The real freaks are the ones who exist solely on a diet of mainstream culture ; the sick wretched fish-heads.
CW: Is there a link between this conception of ‘cancer’ and the film Cancer that you made? I was thinking of this in terms of a kind of entropic relationship between representation and what is represented: the destructing pixels and the way that you transpose an image into a highly worked pencil surface that obsessively covers every inch of the paper, kind of petrifying it?
When I made the "Cancer" video I was not thinking of mainstream culture actually I was thinking of the fact of Cancer and how it relates to proliferation of life and to creativity. I was symbolically disrupting/ corrupting/ invading the very fabric of the fact, partly demonstrating my basic doubts about the value of facts.
I have a liking for disrupting the picture plane (in some of the videos) and fixating on the surface of the image (in the HB pencil drawings) as the source of horror and claustrophobia within the act of perception. There is this thing that some people get which is like a macro very close proximity kind of hallucination which elicits a primal gag reflex kind of thing. I used to get it when I stared at the wall as I drifted off to sleep and would start to get this memory or something almost of being microscopic and the texture of the wall is suddenly magnified/ amplified loads of rubbery fingers pushing in your face only you don't have a face, as such. It isn't even a visual thing just this sightless wordless yet physical primal awareness of proximity to something else. It's a pre-lingual kind of thing that's impossible to describe accurately in words.
You describe yourself as a feminist. How do you see feminism at this point in time, and how is that a part of the historical Feminist movement? Are your collaborations with other female artists such as Lucy Mckenzie and Paulina Olowska, or indeed your involvement in the collective activity of donAteller, a part of these politics?
I am a feminist. If women have a deep sense of themselves within the world then it's good for the world because women have egos and women are mothers; if they're oppressed then the world pays the price because the only domain of influence then left for the woman is the one over her own child. Hysterical mothers make hysterical misogynist men out of sons. Also oppressed hysterical mothers take it out on their daughters especially when the daughter reaches adolescence. Woman's pleasure and sense of self is not at the expense of man's. Men would be so much happier in a truly matriarchal society. A man's physical strength belongs to women and children; it's a mistake to think that it's to enable him to subdue and control woman. Something which is overlooked in our culture is the destructive force of misandry i.e. a woman's hatred of men. The reason it's overlooked is that it's so institutionalized and so ingrained. It's actually assumed and accepted that women hate men but that's because the oppression of women is assumed and accepted. Also a woman's hatred of men when openly expressed is wrongly deemed as ineffectual. I dislike it when women refuse to acknowledge feminism. I couldn't be friends with a woman who wasn't a feminist. My collaborations with Paulina are based on shared feminist values and sisterhood but importantly we are both very interested in femininity and what is the feminine; currently inherent to my interest in autism in women- relative to the EMBTA (Extreme Male Brain theory of Autism).
Dienstag, 4. Mai 2010
TRISHA DONNELLY
Vortrag
Trisha Donnelly
Mittwoch, 31. März 2010, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Trisha Donnelly wurde 1974 in San Francisco geboren; sie lebt and arbeitet in New York.
Einzelausstellungen: 2009: Museo d'Arte Moderna di Bologna (MAMbo), Bologna; 2008: Centre d'édition Contemporain, Bâtiment d'art Contemporain, Genf; Institute of Contemporary Art Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Renaissance Society, University of Chicago; The Douglas Hyde Museum, Dublin; 2007: Modern Art Oxford, Oxford; Casey Kaplan, New York; 2006: Air de Paris, Paris; 2005: artpace, San Antonio, Texas; Kölnischer Kunstverein, Köln; Kunsthalle Zürich, Zürich; 2004: Casey Kaplan, New York; The Wrong Gallery, New York; 2002: Casey Kaplan 10-6, New York; Air de Paris, Paris
Trisha Donnelly
Mittwoch, 31. März 2010, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Trisha Donnelly wurde 1974 in San Francisco geboren; sie lebt and arbeitet in New York.
Einzelausstellungen: 2009: Museo d'Arte Moderna di Bologna (MAMbo), Bologna; 2008: Centre d'édition Contemporain, Bâtiment d'art Contemporain, Genf; Institute of Contemporary Art Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Renaissance Society, University of Chicago; The Douglas Hyde Museum, Dublin; 2007: Modern Art Oxford, Oxford; Casey Kaplan, New York; 2006: Air de Paris, Paris; 2005: artpace, San Antonio, Texas; Kölnischer Kunstverein, Köln; Kunsthalle Zürich, Zürich; 2004: Casey Kaplan, New York; The Wrong Gallery, New York; 2002: Casey Kaplan 10-6, New York; Air de Paris, Paris
FLORIAN PUMHÖSL
Vortrag
Florian Pumhösl
Dienstag, 20. April, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Florian Pumhösl (*1971 in Vienna, lives and works there) constructs new referential systems, based on the mediation of avant-gardes graphic, painterly and architectonic tropes. His 16mm films and animations assimilate techniques and motifs of early scientific and abstract experimental filmmaking to constitute original reflections on the cinematic apparatus and its implications. Minimal glass paintings, which reproduce basic geometrical shapes, and films are woven together on an equal level with historical elements in considered exhibition displays. Pumhösl focuses particularly on strategies of appropriation, citation and montage and the research of European, Russian and Japanese art and architecture avant-gardes as the aesthetic equivalent to the mechanization of industrial production.
Florian Pumhösl
Dienstag, 20. April, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Florian Pumhösl (*1971 in Vienna, lives and works there) constructs new referential systems, based on the mediation of avant-gardes graphic, painterly and architectonic tropes. His 16mm films and animations assimilate techniques and motifs of early scientific and abstract experimental filmmaking to constitute original reflections on the cinematic apparatus and its implications. Minimal glass paintings, which reproduce basic geometrical shapes, and films are woven together on an equal level with historical elements in considered exhibition displays. Pumhösl focuses particularly on strategies of appropriation, citation and montage and the research of European, Russian and Japanese art and architecture avant-gardes as the aesthetic equivalent to the mechanization of industrial production.
MARION VON OSTEN
Vortrag
Marion von Osten: The Colonial Modern
Donnerstag, 6. Mai, 19 Uhr, Aula
Alle Veranstaltungen der Architekturklasse finden in englischer Sprache statt.
Based on her exhibition “In the Desert of Modernity – Colonial Planning and After” at the House of World Cultures (Berlin, 2008) Marion von Osten´s lecture focuses on the transformation of colonial North Africa into a laboratory for European modernization. The car-oriented city, the underground car park and other projects were intended as a blueprint for Europe’s metropolises, too. The lecture presents works of architecture and urban concepts and provides insight into the relationship and dependencies between the European modernity and colonialism.
Marion von Osten works with curatorial, artistic, and theoretical approaches that converge through the medium of exhibitions, installations, video and text productions, lecture performances, conferences, and film programs. She is a founding member of Labor k3000, Kleines Post-fordistisches Drama, and the Center for Post-Colonial Knowledge and Culture, Berlin. Since 2006 she is Professor at the Academy of Fine Arts, Vienna. Von Osten co-curated Atelier Europa (Kunstverein München, 2004), “Projekt Migration” (with Kathrin Rhomberg, Kölnischer Kunstverein) on the history of migration in post-war Germany and was artistic director of Transit Migration (2003–2005).
Marion von Osten: The Colonial Modern
Donnerstag, 6. Mai, 19 Uhr, Aula
Alle Veranstaltungen der Architekturklasse finden in englischer Sprache statt.
Based on her exhibition “In the Desert of Modernity – Colonial Planning and After” at the House of World Cultures (Berlin, 2008) Marion von Osten´s lecture focuses on the transformation of colonial North Africa into a laboratory for European modernization. The car-oriented city, the underground car park and other projects were intended as a blueprint for Europe’s metropolises, too. The lecture presents works of architecture and urban concepts and provides insight into the relationship and dependencies between the European modernity and colonialism.
Marion von Osten works with curatorial, artistic, and theoretical approaches that converge through the medium of exhibitions, installations, video and text productions, lecture performances, conferences, and film programs. She is a founding member of Labor k3000, Kleines Post-fordistisches Drama, and the Center for Post-Colonial Knowledge and Culture, Berlin. Since 2006 she is Professor at the Academy of Fine Arts, Vienna. Von Osten co-curated Atelier Europa (Kunstverein München, 2004), “Projekt Migration” (with Kathrin Rhomberg, Kölnischer Kunstverein) on the history of migration in post-war Germany and was artistic director of Transit Migration (2003–2005).
Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2010
Mathias Poledna
Vortrag
Mathias Poledna: Songs to Remember
Mittwoch, 27. Januar, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Mathias Poledna (*1965 Vienna/A, lives and works in Vienna, Los Angeles/USA) belongs to a generation of artists, who at the outset of the 1990s, with recourse to both the critical attitude towards institutions developed by the art of the 1960s and 1970s and to the conceptual practices of inquiry, analysis, and documentation, called into question the conditions under which art was being created and pushed for its re-politicization. With reference to the mass media’s collective memory of images, Poledna has repeatedly focused on the visualization of historic constellations in both political and popular culture contexts.
Mathias Poledna: Songs to Remember
Mittwoch, 27. Januar, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Mathias Poledna (*1965 Vienna/A, lives and works in Vienna, Los Angeles/USA) belongs to a generation of artists, who at the outset of the 1990s, with recourse to both the critical attitude towards institutions developed by the art of the 1960s and 1970s and to the conceptual practices of inquiry, analysis, and documentation, called into question the conditions under which art was being created and pushed for its re-politicization. With reference to the mass media’s collective memory of images, Poledna has repeatedly focused on the visualization of historic constellations in both political and popular culture contexts.
Mike Bouchet
Vortrag
Mike Bouchet
Dienstag, 26. Januar, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Mike Bouchet was born 1970 in California, USA.
Lives and works in Frankfurt, Germany.
The work produced by Bouchet in recent years seems to present a compulsion to alter one’s place in the world by reproducing and re-contextualizing “desirable” things in and of the world. His projects and exploits are one-to-one models—real transactions with their own autonomy and agency. You cannot alter your place in the world without first altering your image of the world. Bouchet’s endeavor goes beyond representation or a kind of DIY prudence, into what can best be described as a real-life parody. This artist uses everything at his disposal to grow, package, and pitch his own products. In systems such as these, even real transactions are not completely convincing, the reification of one’s product through extensive image production is needed to make it completely viable.
Recent solo shows include ‘CANBURGER’, Galerie Georges-Phillipe & Nathalie Vallois, Paris; ‘New New Age Film Festival’, Galerie Parisa Kind, Frankfurt am Main (both 2008) and ‘16x9 Action Film’, Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris (2008) and MOCA, Los Angeles (2007). Group shows include ‘Making Worlds’, 53rd Venice Biennale; ‘Quand la première ivresse des succès bruyants ….’ CAPC Musée d’Art Contemporain de Bordeaux (both 2009) and ‘Meet Me Around The Corner’, Astrup Fearnley Museum of Modern Art, Oslo (2008).
Mike Bouchet
Dienstag, 26. Januar, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Mike Bouchet was born 1970 in California, USA.
Lives and works in Frankfurt, Germany.
The work produced by Bouchet in recent years seems to present a compulsion to alter one’s place in the world by reproducing and re-contextualizing “desirable” things in and of the world. His projects and exploits are one-to-one models—real transactions with their own autonomy and agency. You cannot alter your place in the world without first altering your image of the world. Bouchet’s endeavor goes beyond representation or a kind of DIY prudence, into what can best be described as a real-life parody. This artist uses everything at his disposal to grow, package, and pitch his own products. In systems such as these, even real transactions are not completely convincing, the reification of one’s product through extensive image production is needed to make it completely viable.
Recent solo shows include ‘CANBURGER’, Galerie Georges-Phillipe & Nathalie Vallois, Paris; ‘New New Age Film Festival’, Galerie Parisa Kind, Frankfurt am Main (both 2008) and ‘16x9 Action Film’, Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris (2008) and MOCA, Los Angeles (2007). Group shows include ‘Making Worlds’, 53rd Venice Biennale; ‘Quand la première ivresse des succès bruyants ….’ CAPC Musée d’Art Contemporain de Bordeaux (both 2009) and ‘Meet Me Around The Corner’, Astrup Fearnley Museum of Modern Art, Oslo (2008).
Samstag, 23. Januar 2010
SPACE AND TIME IN ARCHITECTURE AND EXHIBITIONS
The Architecture Class presents:
Public Panel Discussion: "Space and Time in Architecture and Exhibitions"
Monday, 25th January, 18h, Aula
Alle Veranstaltungen der Architekturklasse finden in englischer Sprache statt.
The modern notions of time and space in architecture are defined in terms of mutual dependency through an unresolved, dialectical hierarchy. One is supposed to follow the other and in this manner make the other legible. However, this relation of intelligibility is problematic since we construe space from systems of projection that far exceed the extensions give in Euclidean space, and the flow and experience of time can be reduced neither to a discrete nor a continueous condition. Nowhere is this unresolved relation between time and space more clear than in exhibitions - whether in art or architecture. These events use narratives and compositional adjacency relations in spatial terms to propose temporally defined relations.
*Jeffrey Kipnis*
Jeffrey Kipnis, currently a professor at Knowlton School of Architecture, Ohio State University and a visiting professor at Harvard, Colombia and Angewandte Kunst, Vienna is a world renowned architectural critic, educator and author. His work attempts to define and correlate the intellectual, cultural and political role of contemporary architecture – ranging from his writing which include:/ Toward a New Architecture/, /Twisting the Separatrix/ and /Political Space I/, to studies on 20^th century key figures such as Philip Johnson, Peter Eisenman, Rem Koolhaas and Daniel Libeskind, to various exhibitions on architectural drawing and design and his award-winning film on the work of Frank Gehry.
*Ben van Berkel*
Ben van Berkel is the Dean of the Städelschule Architecture Class and the co-founder of UNStudio. He has co-authored a number of books and essays and has been a visiting lecturer at Princeton, Columbia University, Harvard, the Berlage Institute and UCLA. Central to his work is an interest in the integration of construction and architecture. Recent projects include the Mercedes-Benz Museum in Stuttgart; the restructuring of the station area of Arnhem, The New Amsterdam Plein & Pavilion in Battery Park New York, the MUMUTH Music Theatre in Graz and the Raffles City development in Hangzhou, China.
*Johan Bettum*
Johan Bettum is a professor of architecture and the program director of the Städelschule Architecture Class. He has also taught at the AA, UCLA, the Berlage Institute, Innsbruck University, the EPFL in Lausanne and Oslo School of Architecture. Bettum has a PhD in fibre-reinforced material systems entitled /The Material Geometry of Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites and Architectural Tectonics./ He has written for a number of prominent publications while his work is repeatedly published in Graz Architecture Magazine, Domus and Architecture Design (AD) to name but a few. His practice, ArchiGlobe, focuses on architecture within the context of research and experiments.
*Nikolaus Hirsch*
Nikolaus Hirsch is a Stiftungsprofessor at the Städelschule who has hold academic positions at the Architectural Association in London, at the Institute of Applied Theater Studies at Giessen University, and at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. His work includes the award-winning Dresden Synagogue, the Hinzert Document Center, and numerous exhibition architectures such as “Making Things Public” at the ZKM (curated by Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel), “Frequencies-Hz” at Schirn Kunsthalle and "Indian Highway" (Serpentine Gallery, 2008). Hirsch´s ongoing research in institutional models has resulted in projects such as the Bockenheimer Depot Theater (with William Forsythe), Unitednationsplaza in Berlin (with Anton Vidokle), European Kunsthalle, Cybermohalla Hub in Delhi and currently a studio structure for Rirkrit Tiravanija´s “The Land”.
Public Panel Discussion: "Space and Time in Architecture and Exhibitions"
Monday, 25th January, 18h, Aula
Alle Veranstaltungen der Architekturklasse finden in englischer Sprache statt.
The modern notions of time and space in architecture are defined in terms of mutual dependency through an unresolved, dialectical hierarchy. One is supposed to follow the other and in this manner make the other legible. However, this relation of intelligibility is problematic since we construe space from systems of projection that far exceed the extensions give in Euclidean space, and the flow and experience of time can be reduced neither to a discrete nor a continueous condition. Nowhere is this unresolved relation between time and space more clear than in exhibitions - whether in art or architecture. These events use narratives and compositional adjacency relations in spatial terms to propose temporally defined relations.
*Jeffrey Kipnis*
Jeffrey Kipnis, currently a professor at Knowlton School of Architecture, Ohio State University and a visiting professor at Harvard, Colombia and Angewandte Kunst, Vienna is a world renowned architectural critic, educator and author. His work attempts to define and correlate the intellectual, cultural and political role of contemporary architecture – ranging from his writing which include:/ Toward a New Architecture/, /Twisting the Separatrix/ and /Political Space I/, to studies on 20^th century key figures such as Philip Johnson, Peter Eisenman, Rem Koolhaas and Daniel Libeskind, to various exhibitions on architectural drawing and design and his award-winning film on the work of Frank Gehry.
*Ben van Berkel*
Ben van Berkel is the Dean of the Städelschule Architecture Class and the co-founder of UNStudio. He has co-authored a number of books and essays and has been a visiting lecturer at Princeton, Columbia University, Harvard, the Berlage Institute and UCLA. Central to his work is an interest in the integration of construction and architecture. Recent projects include the Mercedes-Benz Museum in Stuttgart; the restructuring of the station area of Arnhem, The New Amsterdam Plein & Pavilion in Battery Park New York, the MUMUTH Music Theatre in Graz and the Raffles City development in Hangzhou, China.
*Johan Bettum*
Johan Bettum is a professor of architecture and the program director of the Städelschule Architecture Class. He has also taught at the AA, UCLA, the Berlage Institute, Innsbruck University, the EPFL in Lausanne and Oslo School of Architecture. Bettum has a PhD in fibre-reinforced material systems entitled /The Material Geometry of Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites and Architectural Tectonics./ He has written for a number of prominent publications while his work is repeatedly published in Graz Architecture Magazine, Domus and Architecture Design (AD) to name but a few. His practice, ArchiGlobe, focuses on architecture within the context of research and experiments.
*Nikolaus Hirsch*
Nikolaus Hirsch is a Stiftungsprofessor at the Städelschule who has hold academic positions at the Architectural Association in London, at the Institute of Applied Theater Studies at Giessen University, and at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. His work includes the award-winning Dresden Synagogue, the Hinzert Document Center, and numerous exhibition architectures such as “Making Things Public” at the ZKM (curated by Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel), “Frequencies-Hz” at Schirn Kunsthalle and "Indian Highway" (Serpentine Gallery, 2008). Hirsch´s ongoing research in institutional models has resulted in projects such as the Bockenheimer Depot Theater (with William Forsythe), Unitednationsplaza in Berlin (with Anton Vidokle), European Kunsthalle, Cybermohalla Hub in Delhi and currently a studio structure for Rirkrit Tiravanija´s “The Land”.
Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010
Rundgang 2010
Jahresausstellung der Studierenden der
Städelschule
Eröffnung mit Preisverleihung: Freitag, 12. Februar 2010, 18 Uhr, Dürerstrasse 10
Party: ab 22 Uhr, Daimlerstrasse 32 – 36
Ausstellungsdauer: 13. bis 15. Februar 2010
Öffnungszeiten: 10 – 20 Uhr
Shuttlebus zwischen Dürer- und Daimlerstraße am Wochenende ab 11Uhr stündlich.
Eintritt Frei!
Mit freundlicher Unterstützung von:
Städelschule Portikus e.V.
Hans und Stefan Bernbeck-Stiftung
Lohr & Schach
Delbrück Bethmann Maffei ABN AMRO AG
Linklaters LLP
Haus & Grund Deutschland
Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank
Frankfurter Verein für Künstlerhilfe e.V.
Ernst & Young GmbH
Albig-Stiftung
Agassi F. Bangura & Claus Rasmussen
"African fitness Studio" Installation, verschiedene Materialien, 2009
Städelschule
Eröffnung mit Preisverleihung: Freitag, 12. Februar 2010, 18 Uhr, Dürerstrasse 10
Party: ab 22 Uhr, Daimlerstrasse 32 – 36
Ausstellungsdauer: 13. bis 15. Februar 2010
Öffnungszeiten: 10 – 20 Uhr
Shuttlebus zwischen Dürer- und Daimlerstraße am Wochenende ab 11Uhr stündlich.
Eintritt Frei!
Mit freundlicher Unterstützung von:
Städelschule Portikus e.V.
Hans und Stefan Bernbeck-Stiftung
Lohr & Schach
Delbrück Bethmann Maffei ABN AMRO AG
Linklaters LLP
Haus & Grund Deutschland
Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank
Frankfurter Verein für Künstlerhilfe e.V.
Ernst & Young GmbH
Albig-Stiftung
Agassi F. Bangura & Claus Rasmussen
"African fitness Studio" Installation, verschiedene Materialien, 2009
Montag, 14. Dezember 2009
REBECCA BLIGH
Vortrag
Rebecca Bligh: "Autism: Systemizing, and Styles of Thinking."
Mittwoch, 16. Dezember, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
The lecture will explore current theories of autism; those of Professor Simon Baron-Cohen of the Autism Research Centre in Cambridge, and those of Dr. Temple Grandin, next to “Rain Man” the most renowned autistic person on the planet. Particular attention will be paid to the relevance of 'brain sex' to the tendency to 'hypersystemize' (Baron-Cohen) and to the various thinking styles Grandin describes as typical of autism, understood, in both cases, as extremes on a continuum to which we all belong, neuro-typical and -atypical alike.
Rebecca Bligh is a London-based writer and academic who is doing a PhD at Goldsmiths on the French phenomenologist Henry Corbin. Outside the confines of doctoral research, Rebecca has published on diverse subjects, most recently “Readers Wives” pornography, and libraries.
Rebecca Bligh: "Autism: Systemizing, and Styles of Thinking."
Mittwoch, 16. Dezember, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
The lecture will explore current theories of autism; those of Professor Simon Baron-Cohen of the Autism Research Centre in Cambridge, and those of Dr. Temple Grandin, next to “Rain Man” the most renowned autistic person on the planet. Particular attention will be paid to the relevance of 'brain sex' to the tendency to 'hypersystemize' (Baron-Cohen) and to the various thinking styles Grandin describes as typical of autism, understood, in both cases, as extremes on a continuum to which we all belong, neuro-typical and -atypical alike.
Rebecca Bligh is a London-based writer and academic who is doing a PhD at Goldsmiths on the French phenomenologist Henry Corbin. Outside the confines of doctoral research, Rebecca has published on diverse subjects, most recently “Readers Wives” pornography, and libraries.
KEREN CYTTER
Vortrag
Keren Cytter: Integral outlines
Dienstag, 15. Dezember, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Keren Cytter currently lives and works in Berlin. Recent solo exhibitions include CCA Center for Contemporary Art, Kitakyushu (2009), X-Initiative, NY (2009), Witte de With, Rotterdam (2008), and MUMOK, Vienna (2007). Her work is currently featured in the 53rd Venice Biennale and was included in group shows such as Television Delivers People, the Whitney Museum of American Art, New York (2008), Manifesta 7, Trentino (2008) and the Yokohama Triennale, Yokohama (2008). She was nominated for the Preis der Nationalgalerie für Junge Kunst 2009, Berlin. Cytter is the author of three novels, most recently The True Story of MosheKlinberg, 2009, Onestar Press, Paris.
Keren Cytter: Integral outlines
Dienstag, 15. Dezember, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Keren Cytter currently lives and works in Berlin. Recent solo exhibitions include CCA Center for Contemporary Art, Kitakyushu (2009), X-Initiative, NY (2009), Witte de With, Rotterdam (2008), and MUMOK, Vienna (2007). Her work is currently featured in the 53rd Venice Biennale and was included in group shows such as Television Delivers People, the Whitney Museum of American Art, New York (2008), Manifesta 7, Trentino (2008) and the Yokohama Triennale, Yokohama (2008). She was nominated for the Preis der Nationalgalerie für Junge Kunst 2009, Berlin. Cytter is the author of three novels, most recently The True Story of MosheKlinberg, 2009, Onestar Press, Paris.
Freitag, 11. Dezember 2009
CONFERENCE "FAREWELL TO CONTEMPORARY ART?"
Tagung
"Farewell To Contemporary Art?"
A Conference in two parts
Teil 1: Montag, 14. Dezember, 14-20 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Die Veranstaltung ist eine Zusammenarbeit mit der ALLIANZ KULTURSTIFTUNG
Speakers: Alexander Alberro, Carrie Lambert-Beatty, Jack Bankowsky
Response: Vanessa Joan Müller, Stefan Deines, Isabelle Graw, Daniel Birnbaum
The category “Contemporary Art” has risen to a label full of promise. This is true for the city of Frankfurt in particular, where the expansion of the Städelmuseum has been justified with the need for collecting Contemporary Art. “Contemporary Art” is a composite term which contains a double charge: it promises “art” and an edgy timeline. It therefore fuses two assumptions of value. As much as “Art” is a term with an evaluative dimension, refering back to the idealist notion of a trans-historical truth and disinterestedness, “contemporary” is a slightly unspecific designator of time because it can designate what is happening at this very moment but also point to the last ten years. Since the 1990´s, contemporariness has come to be firmly associated with hipness and being “in”, and so the contemporary art enthusiast is entitled to see himself as a member of those in the know. Yet the label “contemporary art” also allowed the art world to lose its reputation for elitism. It suggests that being of your time is all it takes to understand this art, for it, too, is a phenomenon of its time. This attempt at popularisation implicit in the principle of contemporary art has worked out well. But it came at a price – the disrespect paid to the traditional specialized knowledge that is indispensable to a proper understanding of artistic practice.
But what happens when this double presumption of value on which the symbolic charisma of contemporary art is founded upon ceases to be self-evident – a process we can currently observe taking place as a consequence of the global economic crisis? Every economic crisis is also a crisis of confidence: our trust in values, both economic and symbolic, is profoundly shaken. Just as the “boom” is now a thing of the past, the principle of “Contemporary Art”, too, epitomizes a past era, despite its invocation of contemporariness. Should we, then, drop the term “contemporary art” altogether because the claim to value it presupposes has always been questionable and is now surely more questionable?
ISABELLE GRAW
Dr. Isabelle Graw is a Professor of Art History and Criticism at the Staatliche Hochschule für Bildende Künste - Städelschule.
DANIEL BIRNBAUM
Rector of the Städelschule and director of Portikus.
VANESSA JOAN MÜLLER
Müller has been the director of the Kunstverein für die Rheinlande und Westfalen in Düsseldorf since September 2006.
Müller graduated from the Ruhr-Universität in Bochum with a degree in art history and film studies. From 2000 to 2005 she worked as a curator at the Frankfurter Kunstverein and in late 2005 became academic director of the project “European Kunsthalle” in Cologne, which explores different models for a potential art institution.
Vanessa Joan Müller has curated exhibitions such as “non-places” (Frankfurter Kunstverein, 2002), “New Heimat” (Frankfurter Kunstverein, 2001) and “Adorno. The possibility of the impossible” (co-curated with Nicolaus Schafhausen, Frankfurter Kunstverein, 2004) and devised a programme of lectures and events entitled “Under Construction” for the European Kunsthalle, also with Nicolaus Schafhausen. Numerous publications on contemporary art and art theory confirm her position as a curator with a strong interest in contemporary art and its social and philosophical contexts.
She has written for numerous artist’s editions and catalogues, including those of De Rijke/De Rooij & Christopher Williams, Isa Genzken, Henning Bohl and Silke Schatz. She is co-author of Adorno. Die Möglichkeit des Unmöglichen (Frankfurter Kunstverein, 2003) and Palermo (Kunsthalle Düsseldorf & Künstverein Düsseldorf, 2007).
STEFAN DEINES
Stefan Deines teaches Philosophy at the Goethe University of Frankfurt am Main; he wrote his PhD thesis on the subject Immanent Critique. Models of Critical Agency in Hermeneutics, Post-Structuralisms and Neo-Pragmatism; his main fields of interest include Critical Theory, Philosophy of History, Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art.
ALEXANDER ALBERRO
Columbia University, New York
Virginia Bloedel Wright Associate Professor of Art History, Barnard
Modern and contemporary Art; History of Photography
Ph.D., Northwestern, 1996
Alexander Alberro's courses and graduate advising is in the area of modern and contemporary European, U.S., and Latin American art, as well as in the history of photography. His essays on modern and contemporary art have appeared in a wide variety of journals and exhibition catalogues. He is also the author of Conceptual Art and the Politics of Publicity (2003), and has edited a number of books on contemporary art for MIT Press and the University of California Press, including Institutional Critique: An Anthology of Artists Writings; Art After Conceptual Art; Museum Fictions; Recording Conceptual Art; Two-Way Mirror Power; and Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology. Alberro is currently completing book-length study of the emergence and development of abstract art in Latin America and is beginning to work on a volume that explores new forms of art and spectatorship that have crystallized in the past two decades.
CARRIE LAMBERT-BEATTY
Harvard University, Cambridge
Assistant Professor of Visual and Environmental Studies and of History of Art and Architecture
Department of Visual and Environmental Studies
Lambert-Beatty is an art historian whose research focuses on art since 1960, especially performance and video. She received her PhD from Stanford University in 2002, and has been a fellow at the Whitney Museum of American Art Independent Study Program and the Getty Research Institute. Her writing on performance art, postmodern dance, and minimalism has been published in exhibition catalogs and in journals such as Trans, Art Journal, and October magazine, of which she has been an editor since 2008. Her book Being Watched: Yvonne Rainer and the 1960s (MIT Press, 2008) was the 2008 winner of the de la Torre prize for scholarship on dance. Lambert-Beatty is working on a new project on recent intersections of art and activism, parts of which have been published in the journal Signs (Winter 2008) and October (Summer 2009).
JACK BANKOWSKY
was the Editor-in-Chief of Artforum throughout the 1990s (1992-2003) and the founding editor of Artforum's sister publication, Bookforum, where he was editor from 1996 to 1998. He is currently Editor-at-Large of Artforum and a freelance critic and curator. Bankowsky has served on the juries of Takashi Murakami's GEISAI art fair and the Venice Biennale, and his controversial contemporary survey exhibition, "Pop Life: Art in a Material World," (co-curated with Alison Gingeras and Catherine Wood) is scheduled to open at Tate Modern in the fall of 2009. A visiting scholar at Yale University in the fall of 2004 and 2005, and at UCLA in 2008, he has lectured extensively on contemporary art. Recent writings have addressed the art of David Hammons, Louise Lawler, Jason Rhoades, and Richard Prince. Bankowsky's essay "Ciao Rensselaerville," on the latter artist's work, appears in the catalogue of his 2007 Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum retrospective.
"Farewell To Contemporary Art?"
A Conference in two parts
Teil 1: Montag, 14. Dezember, 14-20 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Die Veranstaltung ist eine Zusammenarbeit mit der ALLIANZ KULTURSTIFTUNG
Speakers: Alexander Alberro, Carrie Lambert-Beatty, Jack Bankowsky
Response: Vanessa Joan Müller, Stefan Deines, Isabelle Graw, Daniel Birnbaum
The category “Contemporary Art” has risen to a label full of promise. This is true for the city of Frankfurt in particular, where the expansion of the Städelmuseum has been justified with the need for collecting Contemporary Art. “Contemporary Art” is a composite term which contains a double charge: it promises “art” and an edgy timeline. It therefore fuses two assumptions of value. As much as “Art” is a term with an evaluative dimension, refering back to the idealist notion of a trans-historical truth and disinterestedness, “contemporary” is a slightly unspecific designator of time because it can designate what is happening at this very moment but also point to the last ten years. Since the 1990´s, contemporariness has come to be firmly associated with hipness and being “in”, and so the contemporary art enthusiast is entitled to see himself as a member of those in the know. Yet the label “contemporary art” also allowed the art world to lose its reputation for elitism. It suggests that being of your time is all it takes to understand this art, for it, too, is a phenomenon of its time. This attempt at popularisation implicit in the principle of contemporary art has worked out well. But it came at a price – the disrespect paid to the traditional specialized knowledge that is indispensable to a proper understanding of artistic practice.
But what happens when this double presumption of value on which the symbolic charisma of contemporary art is founded upon ceases to be self-evident – a process we can currently observe taking place as a consequence of the global economic crisis? Every economic crisis is also a crisis of confidence: our trust in values, both economic and symbolic, is profoundly shaken. Just as the “boom” is now a thing of the past, the principle of “Contemporary Art”, too, epitomizes a past era, despite its invocation of contemporariness. Should we, then, drop the term “contemporary art” altogether because the claim to value it presupposes has always been questionable and is now surely more questionable?
ISABELLE GRAW
Dr. Isabelle Graw is a Professor of Art History and Criticism at the Staatliche Hochschule für Bildende Künste - Städelschule.
DANIEL BIRNBAUM
Rector of the Städelschule and director of Portikus.
VANESSA JOAN MÜLLER
Müller has been the director of the Kunstverein für die Rheinlande und Westfalen in Düsseldorf since September 2006.
Müller graduated from the Ruhr-Universität in Bochum with a degree in art history and film studies. From 2000 to 2005 she worked as a curator at the Frankfurter Kunstverein and in late 2005 became academic director of the project “European Kunsthalle” in Cologne, which explores different models for a potential art institution.
Vanessa Joan Müller has curated exhibitions such as “non-places” (Frankfurter Kunstverein, 2002), “New Heimat” (Frankfurter Kunstverein, 2001) and “Adorno. The possibility of the impossible” (co-curated with Nicolaus Schafhausen, Frankfurter Kunstverein, 2004) and devised a programme of lectures and events entitled “Under Construction” for the European Kunsthalle, also with Nicolaus Schafhausen. Numerous publications on contemporary art and art theory confirm her position as a curator with a strong interest in contemporary art and its social and philosophical contexts.
She has written for numerous artist’s editions and catalogues, including those of De Rijke/De Rooij & Christopher Williams, Isa Genzken, Henning Bohl and Silke Schatz. She is co-author of Adorno. Die Möglichkeit des Unmöglichen (Frankfurter Kunstverein, 2003) and Palermo (Kunsthalle Düsseldorf & Künstverein Düsseldorf, 2007).
STEFAN DEINES
Stefan Deines teaches Philosophy at the Goethe University of Frankfurt am Main; he wrote his PhD thesis on the subject Immanent Critique. Models of Critical Agency in Hermeneutics, Post-Structuralisms and Neo-Pragmatism; his main fields of interest include Critical Theory, Philosophy of History, Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art.
ALEXANDER ALBERRO
Columbia University, New York
Virginia Bloedel Wright Associate Professor of Art History, Barnard
Modern and contemporary Art; History of Photography
Ph.D., Northwestern, 1996
Alexander Alberro's courses and graduate advising is in the area of modern and contemporary European, U.S., and Latin American art, as well as in the history of photography. His essays on modern and contemporary art have appeared in a wide variety of journals and exhibition catalogues. He is also the author of Conceptual Art and the Politics of Publicity (2003), and has edited a number of books on contemporary art for MIT Press and the University of California Press, including Institutional Critique: An Anthology of Artists Writings; Art After Conceptual Art; Museum Fictions; Recording Conceptual Art; Two-Way Mirror Power; and Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology. Alberro is currently completing book-length study of the emergence and development of abstract art in Latin America and is beginning to work on a volume that explores new forms of art and spectatorship that have crystallized in the past two decades.
CARRIE LAMBERT-BEATTY
Harvard University, Cambridge
Assistant Professor of Visual and Environmental Studies and of History of Art and Architecture
Department of Visual and Environmental Studies
Lambert-Beatty is an art historian whose research focuses on art since 1960, especially performance and video. She received her PhD from Stanford University in 2002, and has been a fellow at the Whitney Museum of American Art Independent Study Program and the Getty Research Institute. Her writing on performance art, postmodern dance, and minimalism has been published in exhibition catalogs and in journals such as Trans, Art Journal, and October magazine, of which she has been an editor since 2008. Her book Being Watched: Yvonne Rainer and the 1960s (MIT Press, 2008) was the 2008 winner of the de la Torre prize for scholarship on dance. Lambert-Beatty is working on a new project on recent intersections of art and activism, parts of which have been published in the journal Signs (Winter 2008) and October (Summer 2009).
JACK BANKOWSKY
was the Editor-in-Chief of Artforum throughout the 1990s (1992-2003) and the founding editor of Artforum's sister publication, Bookforum, where he was editor from 1996 to 1998. He is currently Editor-at-Large of Artforum and a freelance critic and curator. Bankowsky has served on the juries of Takashi Murakami's GEISAI art fair and the Venice Biennale, and his controversial contemporary survey exhibition, "Pop Life: Art in a Material World," (co-curated with Alison Gingeras and Catherine Wood) is scheduled to open at Tate Modern in the fall of 2009. A visiting scholar at Yale University in the fall of 2004 and 2005, and at UCLA in 2008, he has lectured extensively on contemporary art. Recent writings have addressed the art of David Hammons, Louise Lawler, Jason Rhoades, and Richard Prince. Bankowsky's essay "Ciao Rensselaerville," on the latter artist's work, appears in the catalogue of his 2007 Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum retrospective.
FRANCES SCHOLZ UND MARK VON SCHLEGELL
Frances Scholz und Mark von Schlegell: Inversions
Mittwoch, 9. Dezember, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englisch und deutscher Sprache statt.
Frances Scholz wurde 1962 in Washington D.C. in den USA geboren, studierte an der Universität der Künste Berlin und lebt seit 1988 in Köln. 2002 wurde sie an die Hochschule für Bildende Künste Braunschweig berufen.
"Contemporary writer" Mark von Schlegell is a dual Irish and American citizen. He was born in New York and lives in Cologne. He is the author of the novels Venusia (2005) and Mercury Station (2009) published by M.I.T./Semiotext(e). Venusia was honor’s listed for the 2007 James Tiptree, Jr. Prize in science fiction. His experimental fiction and cultural criticism appear regularly in the international art world. Realometer (2009), a collection of literary essays on Poe, Melville and James Tiptree, Jr. is available from Merve Verlag, Berlin in German.
Mittwoch, 9. Dezember, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englisch und deutscher Sprache statt.
Frances Scholz wurde 1962 in Washington D.C. in den USA geboren, studierte an der Universität der Künste Berlin und lebt seit 1988 in Köln. 2002 wurde sie an die Hochschule für Bildende Künste Braunschweig berufen.
"Contemporary writer" Mark von Schlegell is a dual Irish and American citizen. He was born in New York and lives in Cologne. He is the author of the novels Venusia (2005) and Mercury Station (2009) published by M.I.T./Semiotext(e). Venusia was honor’s listed for the 2007 James Tiptree, Jr. Prize in science fiction. His experimental fiction and cultural criticism appear regularly in the international art world. Realometer (2009), a collection of literary essays on Poe, Melville and James Tiptree, Jr. is available from Merve Verlag, Berlin in German.
SUSANNE GAENSHEIMER
Vortrag
Susanne Gaensheimer: Jack Goldstein
Dienstag, 8 Dezember, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Ausstellung von Jack Goldstein ist die erste in einer neuen Reihe von umfassenden Retrospektiven, die das MMK ausgewählten Positionen seiner Sammlung widmet. Jack Goldstein (geb. 1945 in Montreal, gest. 2003 in San Bernardino), der in der Sammlung des MMK mit exemplarischen Werken vertreten ist, gehört zu den wichtigsten »Künstler-Künstlern« der letzten 30 Jahre. Von Künstlern und dem Fachpublikum international geschätzt, ist er einem breiteren Publikum nach wie vor unbekannt.
Nach seiner Ausbildung u.a. am neu gegründeten California Institute of the Arts in der berühmten »Post-Studio Art«-Klasse von John Baldessari Mitte der 60er Jahre arbeitete er sowohl in Los Angeles als auch in New York. Durch die Gruppenausstellung »Pictures« des Kritikers und Theoretikers Douglas Crimp 1977 im New Yorker »Artists Space« wurde Jack Goldstein als Teil einer neuen Künstlergeneration bekannt, die sich sowohl vom Minimalismus und der Pop-Art absetzte als auch beide Kunstrichtungen kritisch weiterentwickelte. In einem Interview formuliert Goldstein: »Ich interessiere mich für die Lücke zwischen Minimalismus und Pop-Art: für die Objekthaftigkeit und Autonomie im Minimalismus sowie für den Stoff unserer Kultur, der sich in der Pop-Art findet.« Goldsteins außergewöhnliches Oeuvre zeichnet sich durch Vielfalt und Eigenständigkeit aus: Es umfasst Performances, Filme, Schallplatten, Gemälde, graphisch gestaltete Aphorismen und Texte. Für seine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit den medial vermittelten Bildern der westlichen Kultur nutzte er Techniken und Bilder der Kulturindustrie und der Werbung. »Media is sensational« schreibt Jack Goldstein in einem aphoristischen Katalogbeitrag für die documenta 7, der als Leitmotiv für sein Werk betrachtet werden kann. In den 1980er Jahren galt Goldstein neben Richard Prince, Sherrie Levine, Robert Longo und David Salle als einer der wichtigen Künstler der so genannten Picture Generation.
Die Ausstellung im MMK ist die erste umfassende Museumsausstellung des Künstlers in Deutschland seit 1985. Goldstein, der mit Filmen und Gemälden auf der documenta 7 (1982) und 8 (1987) vertreten war, hatte größere Einzelausstellungen in Amerika und Europa, zuletzt 2002 im »Magasin, Centre National d'Art Contemporain«, Grenoble. Die Ausstellung im MMK ist die erste umfassende Museumsausstellung des Künstlers in Deutschland seit 1985.
Dr. Susanne Gaensheimer promovierte 1997 an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, von 1999 – 2001 war sie Direktorin des Westfälischen Kunstvereins in Münster, von 2002-2008 Leiterin der Sammlung für Internationale Gegenwartskunst und Kuratorin in der Städtischen Galerie im Lenbachhaus München und seit 2008 ist sie Direktorin des MMK Museum für Moderne Kunst Frankfurt am Main.
Susanne Gaensheimer: Jack Goldstein
Dienstag, 8 Dezember, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Ausstellung von Jack Goldstein ist die erste in einer neuen Reihe von umfassenden Retrospektiven, die das MMK ausgewählten Positionen seiner Sammlung widmet. Jack Goldstein (geb. 1945 in Montreal, gest. 2003 in San Bernardino), der in der Sammlung des MMK mit exemplarischen Werken vertreten ist, gehört zu den wichtigsten »Künstler-Künstlern« der letzten 30 Jahre. Von Künstlern und dem Fachpublikum international geschätzt, ist er einem breiteren Publikum nach wie vor unbekannt.
Nach seiner Ausbildung u.a. am neu gegründeten California Institute of the Arts in der berühmten »Post-Studio Art«-Klasse von John Baldessari Mitte der 60er Jahre arbeitete er sowohl in Los Angeles als auch in New York. Durch die Gruppenausstellung »Pictures« des Kritikers und Theoretikers Douglas Crimp 1977 im New Yorker »Artists Space« wurde Jack Goldstein als Teil einer neuen Künstlergeneration bekannt, die sich sowohl vom Minimalismus und der Pop-Art absetzte als auch beide Kunstrichtungen kritisch weiterentwickelte. In einem Interview formuliert Goldstein: »Ich interessiere mich für die Lücke zwischen Minimalismus und Pop-Art: für die Objekthaftigkeit und Autonomie im Minimalismus sowie für den Stoff unserer Kultur, der sich in der Pop-Art findet.« Goldsteins außergewöhnliches Oeuvre zeichnet sich durch Vielfalt und Eigenständigkeit aus: Es umfasst Performances, Filme, Schallplatten, Gemälde, graphisch gestaltete Aphorismen und Texte. Für seine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit den medial vermittelten Bildern der westlichen Kultur nutzte er Techniken und Bilder der Kulturindustrie und der Werbung. »Media is sensational« schreibt Jack Goldstein in einem aphoristischen Katalogbeitrag für die documenta 7, der als Leitmotiv für sein Werk betrachtet werden kann. In den 1980er Jahren galt Goldstein neben Richard Prince, Sherrie Levine, Robert Longo und David Salle als einer der wichtigen Künstler der so genannten Picture Generation.
Die Ausstellung im MMK ist die erste umfassende Museumsausstellung des Künstlers in Deutschland seit 1985. Goldstein, der mit Filmen und Gemälden auf der documenta 7 (1982) und 8 (1987) vertreten war, hatte größere Einzelausstellungen in Amerika und Europa, zuletzt 2002 im »Magasin, Centre National d'Art Contemporain«, Grenoble. Die Ausstellung im MMK ist die erste umfassende Museumsausstellung des Künstlers in Deutschland seit 1985.
Dr. Susanne Gaensheimer promovierte 1997 an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, von 1999 – 2001 war sie Direktorin des Westfälischen Kunstvereins in Münster, von 2002-2008 Leiterin der Sammlung für Internationale Gegenwartskunst und Kuratorin in der Städtischen Galerie im Lenbachhaus München und seit 2008 ist sie Direktorin des MMK Museum für Moderne Kunst Frankfurt am Main.
Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009
ISABELLE GRAW
Vortrag
Isabelle Graw: "And the Winner is: Criticism"
Dienstag, 1. Dezember, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
There is no "criticism" as such but different notions and practices of Criticism that have to be examined. As far as art critics are concerned, this talk starts from the premise that there is currently a tendency towards "expanded competence profiles" to be observed. These extended competence profiles - embodied for instance by the critic-curator - are considered to be symptomatic for increased market pressures. While avoiding any nostalgic plea for a return to a more restricted division of labor, it will be demonstrated how criticism as a concept actually implies the production of dualisms. And one of the main dualisms that Criticism assumes and produces is the Dualism between "Art" and "The Market". While pointing to Criticism´s implication in market conditions, Graw nevertheless insists on its potential to question hegemonic value judgments.
Prof. Dr. Isabelle Graw lives and works in Berlin. She founded "Texte zur Kunst", recently published "Der große Preis. Kunst zwischen Markt und Celebrity Kultur" and is a Professor of Art History and Criticism at the Städelschule.
Isabelle Graw: "And the Winner is: Criticism"
Dienstag, 1. Dezember, 19 Uhr, Aula
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
There is no "criticism" as such but different notions and practices of Criticism that have to be examined. As far as art critics are concerned, this talk starts from the premise that there is currently a tendency towards "expanded competence profiles" to be observed. These extended competence profiles - embodied for instance by the critic-curator - are considered to be symptomatic for increased market pressures. While avoiding any nostalgic plea for a return to a more restricted division of labor, it will be demonstrated how criticism as a concept actually implies the production of dualisms. And one of the main dualisms that Criticism assumes and produces is the Dualism between "Art" and "The Market". While pointing to Criticism´s implication in market conditions, Graw nevertheless insists on its potential to question hegemonic value judgments.
Prof. Dr. Isabelle Graw lives and works in Berlin. She founded "Texte zur Kunst", recently published "Der große Preis. Kunst zwischen Markt und Celebrity Kultur" and is a Professor of Art History and Criticism at the Städelschule.
MARK LECKEY
Einweihungsfeier der neuen Übergangsateliers der Städelschule
"The Welcome Party"
Programm:
20:00 Uhr Mark Leckey: The End of the lange Schwanz, Vortrag
21:00 Abendessen
22:00 Nico Vascellari, "Women in the Woods", Konzert
22:30 Party, div. DJ´s
Montag, 30. November 2009
Städelschule
Daimlerstraße 32
60314 Frankfurt am Main
Vortrag
Mark Leckey: The End of the lange Schwanz
Montag, 30. November, 20 Uhr, Projektraum, Daimlerstraße 32
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Anschließend erwartet Sie ein Abendessen, zubereitet von Att Poomtangon zu Ehren Leckeys.
2008 Turner Prize winner Mark Leckey recently embarked on a year-long series of theatrical lectures entitled ‘Mark Leckey in the Long Tail’, bringing together ‘old-school’ didactics, a film soundstage and fine art performance. Leckey deconstructs the ‘Long Tail’ phenomenon by way of the character Felix the Cat, among other manifestations, which he believes embody the concept. A term coined by American journalist Chris Anderson, ‘The Long Tail’ represents the frequency with which marginal endeavours are consumed. The very few most popular are designated by ‘the head’ (take for example, in song-writing the top 40 music chart hits), with the remainder, ‘The Long Tail’, representing the innumerable songs written by unsigned rock units.
Mark Leckey lives and works in London, his work has been exhibited at P.S.1 Contemporary Art Center, New York; Tate Britain, London; and at the Istanbul Biennial, Turkey. His work is included in collections at Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris; The Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles; and the Walker Art Center, Minneapolis. Two of Leckey’s works are in MoMA’s collection: Made in ‘Eaven (2004) and Cinema in the Round (2006–08), which was recently acquired by the Museum.
Mark Leckey has been Professor of Film at the Städelschule since 2005.
"The Welcome Party"
Programm:
20:00 Uhr Mark Leckey: The End of the lange Schwanz, Vortrag
21:00 Abendessen
22:00 Nico Vascellari, "Women in the Woods", Konzert
22:30 Party, div. DJ´s
Montag, 30. November 2009
Städelschule
Daimlerstraße 32
60314 Frankfurt am Main
Vortrag
Mark Leckey: The End of the lange Schwanz
Montag, 30. November, 20 Uhr, Projektraum, Daimlerstraße 32
Die Veranstaltung findet in englischer Sprache statt.
Anschließend erwartet Sie ein Abendessen, zubereitet von Att Poomtangon zu Ehren Leckeys.
2008 Turner Prize winner Mark Leckey recently embarked on a year-long series of theatrical lectures entitled ‘Mark Leckey in the Long Tail’, bringing together ‘old-school’ didactics, a film soundstage and fine art performance. Leckey deconstructs the ‘Long Tail’ phenomenon by way of the character Felix the Cat, among other manifestations, which he believes embody the concept. A term coined by American journalist Chris Anderson, ‘The Long Tail’ represents the frequency with which marginal endeavours are consumed. The very few most popular are designated by ‘the head’ (take for example, in song-writing the top 40 music chart hits), with the remainder, ‘The Long Tail’, representing the innumerable songs written by unsigned rock units.
Mark Leckey lives and works in London, his work has been exhibited at P.S.1 Contemporary Art Center, New York; Tate Britain, London; and at the Istanbul Biennial, Turkey. His work is included in collections at Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris; The Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles; and the Walker Art Center, Minneapolis. Two of Leckey’s works are in MoMA’s collection: Made in ‘Eaven (2004) and Cinema in the Round (2006–08), which was recently acquired by the Museum.
Mark Leckey has been Professor of Film at the Städelschule since 2005.
Abonnieren
Posts (Atom)